<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Build Process on Nuvika Blog</title><link>https://www.nuvikatech.com/blog/categories/build-process/</link><description>Recent content in Build Process on Nuvika Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.152.2</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.nuvikatech.com/blog/categories/build-process/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The 9 Commits That Completed Our Multi-Cloud SLA Claim Filing Module</title><link>https://www.nuvikatech.com/blog/posts/nine-commits-claim-filing/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.nuvikatech.com/blog/posts/nine-commits-claim-filing/</guid><description>A technical founder&amp;#39;s honest account of shipping a complex multi-provider feature: what we designed, what we got wrong in code review, and what we&amp;#39;d do differently.</description></item><item><title>920 Tests, 0 Failures: What AI Pair Programming Actually Looks Like in Production</title><link>https://www.nuvikatech.com/blog/posts/920-tests-ai-pair-programming/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.nuvikatech.com/blog/posts/920-tests-ai-pair-programming/</guid><description>How we used Claude Code to implement, review, and verify a complete feature end-to-end — TDD, subagent-driven development, two-stage code review. What worked, what surprised us.</description></item></channel></rss>