FinOps-aware migrations for AWS, Azure, GCP, and VMware workloads. We plan the cost story before cutover - not after.
Every migration we run plans for the same five patterns. Specific, named, and recoverable.
Apps depend on services nobody mapped. Mid-cutover discoveries cause rollbacks and overruns.
Move as-is, get hit with 2–3× cloud bills within 90 days. Cost shock kills the project narrative.
You can’t tell if the cloud version is “as good” because you never measured the on-prem version.
Migration goes wrong, the cutover window passes, no clean revert path.
Apps move to cloud, teams disband, drift sets in, costs creep, tagging decays.
For each workload we choose one of seven strategies, with the tradeoffs made explicit before cutover.
Lift & shift. Fastest path, lowest optimization. Use when time pressure dominates.
Lift, tweak, & shift. Managed DB swap, EOL OS upgrade. Best general-purpose strategy.
Re-architect for cloud-native patterns. Highest cost, highest long-term return.
Replace with SaaS (legacy CRM → Salesforce, on-prem mail → M365). Cheapest if a credible SaaS exists.
Keep on-prem. For workloads with regulatory, latency, or dependency constraints.
Kill it. 10–20% of audit-targeted workloads turn out to be unused.
VMware vSphere → VMware Cloud (AWS / Azure / GCP). Bridges hybrid strategies.
The capabilities every engagement draws from, mixed to fit your environment.
Surface every service, database, integration, and quirky cron job your apps depend on before cutover, not during.
Cloud-native target design that survives the next three years, not just the cutover. Includes network, identity, and data flow.
Workloads grouped into waves of 5–15 with dependency-aware sequencing. Each wave gates the next.
Pre-cutover TCO models per workload so you know what the bill will look like before you sign the cutover plan.
Step-by-step runbooks with named owners, checkpoint criteria, and decision gates. No improvisation at cutover.
Run on-prem and cloud side-by-side, validate outputs, then flip traffic. Confidence before commitment.
Every cutover has a tested revert path. If something goes wrong in the window, you go back, not forward.
Tuning, security baselines, runbook handover, and on-call rotation alignment. We don't disappear at cutover.
Multi-runtime, multi-source. The workload types we migrate most.
vMotion-aware migrations to VMware Cloud on AWS, Azure VMware Solution, and Google Cloud VMware Engine. Re-platform candidates identified alongside.
Oracle, SQL Server, DB2 → cloud-managed equivalents or migration to PostgreSQL / Aurora. License modeling included.
.NET Framework / Java EE moved to managed runtimes (App Service, Elastic Beanstalk, Cloud Run) or containers when refactoring pays off.
Cluster migrations across EKS, AKS, GKE, and OpenShift. Manifests, secrets, network policies, and observability moved together.
Hadoop and legacy warehouse to BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, or Synapse. ELT pipelines redesigned where needed.
Training pipelines, GPU clusters, model registries, and inference endpoints. Cost-aware GPU selection (A10/L4 vs A100) built into the plan.
Most migrations land technically but become cost disasters within six months. We bake FinOps into migration: cost modeling pre-cutover, FOCUS-aligned tagging set up on day one in cloud, Fintropy baseline scans before and after - so you can prove the migration didn’t blow up your bill.
Already through migration? See our Cloud Cost Optimization Services →
Four phases. Cost modeling sits inside Discovery, not after cutover.
Application inventory, dependency mapping, 7Rs classification per workload, and cost modeling for the top candidates.
Target architecture, wave plan, cutover playbooks, rollback strategies, FOCUS tagging blueprint - everything written down before we touch anything.
Waves of 5–15 workloads at a time. Each wave: cutover window → parallel-run validation → confidence checks → next wave. Rollback if anything fails the gates.
90-day post-cutover cost review and hand-off to ongoing FinOps operating cadence - yours, or our Cloud Cost Optimization Services.
Depends on workload count and complexity. A mid-market migration of 30–80 workloads is typically 8–16 weeks. Large enterprise migrations of 500+ workloads run 6–12 months. Discovery and planning are the first 4 weeks regardless.
Migration moves a workload to the cloud. Modernization changes the workload itself - refactoring to cloud-native services, breaking up monoliths, replacing legacy DBs. The 7Rs framework covers both: Rehost is pure migration; Refactor is modernization.
Depends on the workload architecture. Stateless apps can be migrated with near-zero downtime via blue/green cutover. Stateful systems with dependency chains have a planned cutover window we work to minimize. We tell you the expected window per workload during Discovery.
Yes. vSphere and VCF environments to VMware Cloud on AWS, Azure VMware Solution, and Google Cloud VMware Engine. We also identify replatform candidates where moving off VMware to native cloud services makes more economic sense long-term.
We evaluate each workload on time pressure, cloud-native fit, expected lifetime, and TCO. Rehost wins when there's a hard cutover deadline. Replatform is the default for ~60% of workloads. Refactor is reserved for workloads where the cloud-native return justifies the rewrite.
Discovery and planning are fixed-fee. Execution is typically a blend of fixed-scope waves plus T&M for workloads where scope is harder to lock in. The pre-cutover TCO model includes our fees so you see total cost of the migration plus the projected cloud bill.
Three things. (1) TCO modeling per workload before cutover, so the bill is no surprise. (2) FOCUS-aligned tagging set up at day-1 cutover, not as a year-2 cleanup. (3) Fintropy baseline scans before and after, plus a 90-day post-cutover cost review built into the engagement.
Yes. We design target architectures that maintain in-scope boundary controls, plan cutovers to preserve audit trails, and coordinate with your compliance team on attestation. Some workloads end up classified as Retain rather than migrated - and we'll tell you when that's the right call.
Workload migration is the process of moving an application, service, or data system from one computing environment to another - typically from on-premise infrastructure to a cloud platform (AWS, Azure, or GCP), between clouds, or from a legacy environment to a modernised stack. It covers the full lifecycle: discovery, dependency mapping, TCO modelling, cutover execution, and post-migration validation.
Enterprise workload migration is the structured migration of large-scale, business-critical application portfolios - typically 50 or more workloads with complex dependencies, compliance requirements, and multi-team coordination. It differs from simple lift-and-shift in that it requires formal 7Rs classification per workload, wave-based cutover planning, pre-migration TCO modelling, and FinOps governance from day one to prevent the post-migration cost spikes that affect most large-scale programmes.
Cloud modernization reduces IT cost through three levers: (1) replacing capex hardware refresh cycles with opex cloud subscription, (2) eliminating on-prem maintenance/support contracts on legacy systems, (3) enabling demand-elastic infrastructure that scales to actual use vs sized for peak. Realistic outcome: 20–40% TCO reduction on modernized workloads over 3 years, depending on starting architecture. The savings are larger when refactoring is part of the modernization, not just rehosting.
Per-wave fixed-scope migrations typically range $25K–$250K depending on workload complexity, dependencies, and target architecture (rehost vs refactor). A 200-server datacenter migration in 4–8 waves typically runs $200K–$800K all-in including discovery, runbook authoring, cutover support, and post-cutover stabilization. We price waves individually after a 1-week discovery so scope and cost are locked before execution begins.
Realistic timeline: 6–12 months end-to-end for a 200-server estate. Breakdown: 4–6 weeks discovery & wave planning, 4–8 waves at 4–6 weeks each, 4–8 weeks of post-cutover stabilization. The variable is application complexity, not server count - a heterogeneous estate with legacy middleware extends; a homogeneous VMware estate with modern apps compresses.
Looking for something different? Here's where to go next.
Post-migration discipline. FinOps-led optimization across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes.
The 470-rule platform we use to baseline cost before and after migration.
Stand up a FinOps practice that scales with your new cloud - operating model, governance, tooling, enablement.
Field notes from real migration and multi-cloud platform decisions.
What it actually takes to run the same workload across AWS, Azure, and GCP - and where the abstraction leaks.
How to decide between managed serverless and full Kubernetes when planning a migration target.
Where Indian cloud adopters lose money post-migration - and the controls that actually close the gap.
India-headquartered clients are invoiced in INR. Ranges are indicative - scope locked at SOW after a 1-week discovery.
See all service pricing →Ready to optimize your cloud costs? Schedule a free consultation with our team.
Schedule a Call